While of limited means, I am fond of collecting United
States coinage. I started collecting
Morgan silver dollars and annual proof sets.
As my interests changed, my series of choice is capped bust half
dollars. I have not purchased the 2012
proof sets and I don’t intend to. As
opposed to fiscal prudence, my motivation is simply to limit my purchases as
well as coin inventory. If history is
any guide, these coins will not appreciate in value much.
I do not collect large cents or early gold, but I have spent
some time researching these series. Of
particular interest to me are $3 gold coins issued from 1854 to 1889. Several issues had mintages of around 1000-2000
coins. When gold was at $50/ounce in
1972, these coins had a minimum Red Book price of $350, which is nearly all
numismatic premium (the gold content was a little over $7). I would like to buy one of these coins, but
in 2012 the minimum prices I have seen are on the order of $2500. $2500 represents a numismatic premium of
about $2250.
Inflation over the last 40 years has averaged 4.4%. Gold has appreciated about 9.1% per year,
handily beating inflation. However the
$3 gold coin has only appreciated about 5.0% per year, slightly edging out
inflation. Meanwhile the S&P500 has
returned an average of 6.2% per year.
As an investor and a collector, I wonder if the First Spouse
Coins which have mintages in on the order of 2000-3000 per issue command a significant
numismatic premium in my lifetime.
Certainly in 150 years, these coins would be worth something. However, collecting all four issues annually
in proof and uncirculated grades will cost around $8,000 annually. That is well above my budget. However factoring out gold costs, the
numismatic investment is around $150 per coin.
This is a much easier pill to swallow.
While I don’t plan to own a complete First Spouse
collection, I am interested in picking up an attractive issue at some
point. No offense to the engravers or
first ladies, but Garfield, Hayes and Johnson are not the most attractive of
the mint’s issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment